While the implementation plan prepares students to apply their research to the problem or issue they have identified for their capstone project change proposal, the literature review enables students to map out and move into the active planning and development stages of the project.
A literature review analyzes how current research supports the PICOT, as well as identifies what is known and what is not known in the evidence. Students will use the information from the earlier PICOT Question Paper and Literature Evaluation Table assignments to develop a 750-1,000 word review that includes the following sections:
- Title page
- Introduction section
- A comparison of research questions
- A comparison of sample populations
- A comparison of the limitations of the study
- A conclusion section, incorporating recommendations for further research
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.
Expert Solution Preview
To create the assigned content, I would start by providing an introduction that briefly explains the purpose and importance of conducting a literature review in the context of a capstone project change proposal. I would emphasize how the literature review helps students gain a deeper understanding of the current research related to their chosen problem or issue and guides them in the planning and development stages of their project.
For the first section, the title page, I would instruct the students to include the title of their literature review, their name, the name of their institution, and the date.
In the introduction section, I would emphasize the significance of the research question, explain the importance of conducting a literature review to support the chosen PICOT (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, Time) question, and provide an overview of the sections that will be covered in the review.
In the comparison of research questions section, I would instruct students to identify and compare the research questions from at least two relevant studies. They should analyze how these questions align with or differ from their own PICOT question.
In the comparison of sample populations section, students should compare the characteristics of the sample populations used in each of the selected studies. They should analyze the similarities and differences and discuss how these differences might impact the generalizability of the findings.
In the comparison of the limitations of the study section, students should identify and analyze the limitations of each of the selected studies. They should discuss the implications of these limitations and consider how they might impact the validity and reliability of the findings.
In the conclusion section, students should summarize the key findings and implications from their literature review. They should then provide recommendations for further research based on their analysis of the existing research.
Finally, I would remind students to adhere to the guidelines outlined in the APA Style Guide for formatting and referencing their literature review. I would stress the importance of correctly citing all sources used and provide resources or tutorials on APA citation if needed.
In providing feedback on the literature review assignment, I would evaluate students’ ability to effectively analyze and synthesize the existing research, their understanding of research methodologies, their critical thinking skills, and their ability to provide clear and concise recommendations for further research.
Overall, the literature review assignment aims to encourage students to engage in a thorough examination of the current evidence on their chosen topic, enabling them to make informed decisions in the planning and development of their capstone project change proposal.
