please read file thoroughly aand make sure what is expected please 2: Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews

please read file thoroughly aand make sure what is expected please 

2: Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews

Create a 6- to 7-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following:

· Identify and briefly describe your chosen clinical issue of interest.

· Describe how you developed a PICO(T) question focused on your chosen clinical issue of interest.

· Identify the four research databases that you used to conduct your search for the peer-reviewed articles you selected.

· Provide APA citations of the four relevant peer-reviewed articles at the systematic-reviews level related to your research question. If there are no systematic review level articles or meta-analysis on your topic, then use the highest level of evidence peer reviewed article.

· Describe the levels of evidence in each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, including an explanation of the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research. Be specific and provide examples.

Very important

For this week’s assignment the focus is on systematic reviews, meta- analysis, scoping studies, etc.  Do NOT use a primary research article for this assignment  as you will get a poor grade for that work.  The focus of the assignment is on research articles that review multiple articles on a topic. Remember the articles that you select MUST be peer reviewed and published in the last 5 years (2018- present).

Grading rubric below. Please straightly follow the rubrics For this work, make sure ever points is mentioned. The professor use the rubric to grade. Points is taken off if all details ask is not mentions. Please please

Part 2: Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews Create a 6- to 7-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following: · Identify and briefly describe your chosen clinical issue of interest. · Describe how you developed a PICO(T) question focused on your chosen clinical issue of interest. · Identify the four research databases that you used to conduct your search for the peer-reviewed articles you selected. · Describe the levels of evidence in each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, including an explanation of the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research. Be specific and provide examples

80 to >71.0 pts

Excellent

The presentation clearly and accurately identifies and describes in detail the chosen clinical issue of interest. …The presentation clearly and accurately describes in detail the developed PICO(T) question. …The presentation clearly and accurately identifies four or more research databases used to conduct a search for the peer-reviewed articles selected. …The presentation includes specific and relevant examples that fully support the research. …The presentation provides a complete, detailed, and accurate synthesis of two outside resources related to the peer-reviewed articles selected, and fully integrates at least two outside resources and two or three course-specific resources that fully support the presentation.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Using proper in-text citations, the presentation clearly and accurately provides at least four peer-reviewed systematic review type articles selected, describes the levels of evidence in each of the four articles selected, including a thorough and detailed explanation of the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research.

Resource Synthesis

Resource Formatting Appropriate peer-reviewed articles are included and citations use APA format.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Presentation includes 4 or more peer-reviewed articles selected using systematic reviews for clinical research. …Citations use correct APA format with no errors

PowerPoint Presentation:The presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

The presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order

Written Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

  Ngăn ngừa trầy xước thấu kính thủy tinh Hướng dẫn toàn diệnThấu kính thủy tinh thường được sử dụng trong nhiều thiết bị quang học khác nhau nhưng chú

  Ngăn ngừa trầy xước thấu kính thủy tinh Hướng dẫn toàn diện Thấu kính thủy tinh thường được sử dụng trong nhiều thiết bị quang học khác nhau nhưng chúng dễ bị trầy xước và có thể ảnh hưởng đến hiệu suất của chúng. Hiểu nguyên nhân của những