identify and analyze a case of your choice (no older than 8 years)

identify and analyze a case of your choice (no older than 8 years) that you believe presents a conflict between public health, healthcare ethics, and current legal statutes (i.e., required vaccinations, no smoking policies, food/restaurant labeling requirements, school nutrition policies, etc.).

Then, take the perspective of a healthcare executive or professional solving a public health or ethical dilemma that your organization, community, and/or the healthcare profession at large are facing.

Based on your research and analysis of the case, write an 8–10-page proposal to other healthcare executives soliciting their support for legal reform with the state legislature. Include the following items in your proposal:

  • Describe how healthcare professionals and leaders can bring about changes in healthcare, legal, or ethical issues.
  • Explain the current conflict between public health, healthcare ethics, and the current legal statute you have selected. Use cases and outside resources to explain your position.
  • Present a new piece of legislature that will address the ethical conflict. While there are no wrong or right answers, make sure to link your new law to previous cases and/or healthcare ethical principles. Use existing laws but also be creative in writing a law.
  • Identify the barriers to implementing the law, the stakeholders, and ways in which the barriers can be overcome.

Your proposal should be approximately 8–10 pages in length. Organize your proposal in the following manner:

  • Title page
  • Introduction
    • Summary of selected case
    • Reason for the selection and how it meets the criteria
    • The ethical dilemma
  • Background research
  • Proposal
  • Description of proposal
  • Conflict
  • Proposed legislation
  • Barriers
  • Reference page that follows APA citation guide

Expert Solution Preview

Introduction:
The conflict between public health, healthcare ethics, and legal statutes is a complex issue that healthcare professionals and leaders face. This proposal aims to analyze a case that presents this conflict, take the perspective of a healthcare executive solving a public health or ethical dilemma, and propose a new piece of legislation to address the ethical conflict. The selected case is no older than 8 years and is related to required vaccinations.

Summary of selected case:
In 2014, Disneyland, California, faced a measles outbreak that affected more than 100 people. This outbreak resulted from unvaccinated individuals who visited the park, and it spread the disease to others. This case illustrates the conflict between the healthcare ethics of vaccination and the legal statutes allowing personal or religious exemptions from vaccination requirements.

Reason for the selection and how it meets the criteria:
This case meets the criteria because it illustrates the conflict between public health, healthcare ethics, and legal statutes. Personal or religious exemptions from vaccination requirements have become a controversial issue, and this case demonstrates the consequences of not vaccinating and the need for vaccination requirements to protect public health.

The ethical dilemma:
The ethical dilemma in this case is that personal or religious exemptions from vaccination requirements may harm public health. Vaccination is a healthcare ethics principle that aims to protect individuals and communities from infectious diseases. However, individuals who refuse vaccination due to personal or religious beliefs may violate this principle and put others at risk.

Background research:
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends vaccinations to protect individuals and communities from infectious diseases. Vaccination has been successful in eradicating or controlling many infectious diseases, such as smallpox, polio, and measles. Vaccination requirements are enforced by state laws, but some states allow personal or religious exemptions from these requirements. Personal exemptions are based on personal beliefs or philosophical objections, while religious exemptions are based on religious beliefs. This conflict between ethics and legal statues undermines the effectiveness of vaccination programs and poses a threat to public health.

Proposal:

Description of proposal:
The proposed legislation aims to eliminate personal or religious exemptions from vaccination requirements. The legislation will require all individuals to receive vaccines unless they have a medical condition that precludes vaccination. The legislation will provide funding for the provision of vaccines to individuals who cannot afford them. The legislation will also require healthcare providers to educate patients about the benefits and risks of vaccines and address any concerns they may have.

Conflict:
The proposed legislation conflicts with the personal or religious beliefs of some individuals who oppose vaccination. These individuals may argue that the legislation violates their constitutional rights to freedom of religion or personal beliefs. They may also argue that vaccines are unsafe or ineffective.

Proposed legislation:
The legislation will address the ethical conflict between healthcare ethics and legal statutes by eliminating personal or religious exemptions from vaccination requirements. The legislation will strengthen public health by ensuring that all individuals receive vaccines unless they have a medical condition that precludes vaccination. The legislation will also promote healthcare ethics by prioritizing the health and well-being of individuals and communities.

Barriers:
The stakeholders who may oppose the legislation include individuals who oppose vaccination, healthcare providers who may be reluctant to enforce the requirements, and legislators who may consider the legislation controversial. To overcome these barriers, the legislation will require public education campaigns to raise awareness of the benefits and risks of vaccines, collaborations with healthcare providers to promote vaccination, and political advocacy to secure legislative support.

Reference page follows APA citation guide.

Conclusion:
This proposal presents a solution to the conflict between public health, healthcare ethics, and legal statutes by proposing a piece of legislation that eliminates personal or religious exemptions from vaccination requirements. This proposed legislation will strengthen public health and promote healthcare ethics by ensuring that individuals and communities have access to vaccines that protect against infectious diseases. By addressing the ethical conflict and promoting the well-being of individuals and communities, healthcare professionals and leaders can bring about changes in healthcare, legal, and ethical issues.

#identify #analyze #case #choice #older #years

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Unit 2 Medications to fill templates out for (you should be completing 33 templates – one for each medication. Remember that you need to handwrite

Unit 2 Medications to fill templates out for (you should be completing 33 templates – one for each medication. Remember that you need to handwrite these.) fluconazole ciprofloxacin vancomycin acyclovir tetracycline isoniazid imipenem gentamicin rifampin amoxicillin nitrofurantoin itraconazole aztreonam erythromycin penicillin azithromycin amphotericin metronidazole cephalosporins (generally) trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole Maraviroc Trastuzumab Dexamethasone