HC 450 Herzing University Week 2 DSS and Quality Paper

Unit 2 Assignment 1 – DSS and Quality

  • Due Sunday by 11:59pm
  • Points 40
  • Submitting a text entry box, a website url, a media recording, or a file upload

Suppose you want to develop a decision support system to support a quality of care improvement initiative within the hospital at which you work. Quality initiatives often start with data – using data to improve healthcare.

Instructions

  • Using Simon’s decision-making model, read the article on Using Data to Improve Quality [PDF].
  • Develop a checklist of activities for each phase.
    Submit your report for grading. Your report should be in Microsoft Word format. Cite all sources in APA format.
  • Reminder: You must upload your completed document using Browse My Computer. Then, hit the Submit button to successfully complete the assignment submission process. Do not copy and paste text into the text box.

Rubric

Unit 2 Assignment 1 – DSS and Quality

Unit 2 Assignment 1 – DSS and Quality

CriteriaRatingsPts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent

20.0 pts

Level 5

Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors.

18.0 pts

Level 4

Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement, thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed.

16.0 pts

Level 3

Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial.

14.0 pts

Level 2

Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement or related contextual factors.

12.0 pts

Level 1

Demonstrates the ability to explain contextual factors but does not provide a defined statement.

0.0 pts

Level 0

There is no evidence of a defined statement.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysisPRICE-P

10.0 pts

Level 5

Organizes and compares evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

9.0 pts

Level 4

Organizes and interprets evidence to reveal patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

8.0 pts

Level 3

Organizes and describes evidence according to patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

7.0 pts

Level 2

Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing patterns, differences, or similarities.

6.0 pts

Level 1

Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.

0.0 pts

Level 0

Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting

5.0 pts

Level 5

The paper exhibits an excellent command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.

4.5 pts

Level 4

The paper exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication.

4.0 pts

Level 3

The paper exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication.

3.5 pts

Level 2

The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.

3.0 pts

Level 1

The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.

0.0 pts

Level 0

The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty in discerning the meaning.

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPAPRICE-I

5.0 pts

Level 5

The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references.

4.5 pts

Level 4

The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

4.0 pts

Level 3

The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

3.5 pts

Level 2

The required APA elements are not all included and/or there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

3.0 pts

Level 1

Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate a limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references.

0.0 pts

Level 0

There is little to no evidence of APA formatting and/or there are no in-text citations and/or references.

5.0 pts

Total Points: 40.0

Unit 2 Discussion” aria-describedby=”msf0-previous-desc”>PreviousNext

Expert Solution Preview

Introduction:

As a medical professor, it is important to create assignments that challenge and educate our students. In Unit 2 Assignment 1, students are tasked with developing a decision support system (DSS) to support a quality of care improvement initiative within a hospital. Using Simon’s decision-making model, students must read an article on Using Data to Improve Quality and develop a checklist of activities for each phase.

Answer:

When developing a decision support system for a quality of care improvement initiative, it is important to follow Simon’s decision-making model. This includes the following phases: intelligence, design, choice, and implementation. In the intelligence phase, students can follow a checklist that includes identifying the quality problem, gathering data, and analyzing the data. Once this phase is complete, students can move on to the design phase where they create a list of possible solutions, evaluate the solutions, and select the best option. The choice phase involves implementing the chosen solution and developing a plan to monitor progress and make improvements as necessary. Finally, in the implementation phase, students will execute the plan, evaluate the results, and modify the system as necessary to ensure successful quality improvement. By following this checklist and utilizing Simon’s decision-making model, students can successfully develop and implement a decision support system that supports a quality of care improvement initiative.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

i want you to complete this assignment Please read the Nursing Assignment Help

i want you to complete this assignment Please read the assignment carefully  here is the link of the assignment .. https://www.mediafire.com/file/4ucxvjjxbybplt7/PHA+outline+2024.docx/file https://www.mediafire.com/file/ofo0amjryc5zv63/PHA+questionnaire+2024.doc/file https://www.mediafire.com/file/h2ylykdgzccyb0c/action+plan+2024.doc/file

Trevino, A. J. (2021). Investigating Social Problems. Nursing Assignment Help

Trevino, A. J. (2021). Investigating Social Problems. Available from: VitalSourceBookshelf, (3rd Edition). SAGE Publications, Inc  This is the book Please respond to the following prompt. Grammar and spelling count. Draw upon the textbook and lecture notes in your response. What troubling social condition are you most concerned with (that may