1 Title page (including Group# & member names)
2 Introduction (discussing the global, national, state and local implications of the group policy change and explaining how and why the group selected to focus on this particular policy change. At the end of this section the group should set forth the Group’s proposed policy change in brief);
3 Results (this is where the group states their findings – What the cost of the policy change is expected to entail, sources of funding to implement and maintain said policy change (i.e. the details, the specific language of your policy change);
4 Discussion (this is where your group explains what comparable legislation and support for the group policy change having used the literature and other authoritative external sources to support the arguments made. Also, discuss other similar policies and/or if this policy exists elsewhere, as well as, identifying and addressing the expected concerns of suspected opposing interest groups;
5 Conclusions & Recommendations (this is where you can explain how the policy change accomplishes the group’s ideals/intent of the policy).
2.8.2 APA Style is required only for in-text citations in each of the five sections noted above and the references.
3. Additional Guidance & Requirements
3.1 Citation of a source is required for each paragraph, on each table/chart used and in every sentence where a number appears
3.2 At least one source citation substantively used in each paragraph is required.
3.3 Data and Sources. All data (facts and figures/statistics) shall be referenced appropriately. References and in text citations shall be in APA Style format. For those students that need help with proper APA in text citation and references, please see the following link: Additional APA Style links and documents will be posted on the Class online site. Also, see www.refworks.com – this source is available free to FIU students and will assist you in formatting references properly in APA and other formats. An additional source 8. Required Section Headings/Content in Paper.
Sample Group Term Policy Modification Paper-1.docx
my part is the result and this is the policy change we are going with
2.0 H.R.1667 – Dr. Lorna Breen Health Care Provider Protection Act
In order to strengthen the mental and behavioral health of healthcare professionals, this
measure establishes grants and mandates other actions. The Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS) is specifically required to provide funding to hospitals, medical professional
associations, and other healthcare organizations for initiatives that support the resilience and
mental health of healthcare professionals. Moreover, HHS may give grants to students, residents,
or professionals in the healthcare field for essential mental and behavioral health training
(Congress.gov, 2022).
How to solve
final project , my part
Nursing Assignment Help
Introduction:
The policy change we have selected to focus on is the H.R.1667 – Dr. Lorna Breen Health Care Provider Protection Act. This policy aims to strengthen the mental and behavioral health of healthcare professionals by establishing grants and mandating various actions. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is required to provide funding to hospitals, medical professional associations, and other healthcare organizations for initiatives that support the resilience and mental health of healthcare professionals. Additionally, HHS may grant funding to students, residents, or professionals in the healthcare field for essential mental and behavioral health training (Congress.gov, 2022).
Answer to the content:
Results:
The cost of implementing the H.R.1667 – Dr. Lorna Breen Health Care Provider Protection Act is expected to involve financial investments in training programs, mental health support services, and the establishment of infrastructure to provide comprehensive mental and behavioral health resources for healthcare professionals. These investments are crucial to ensure the well-being and resilience of healthcare providers.
To fund the policy change, it is proposed that a portion of the federal budget allocated to healthcare be dedicated to mental health initiatives for healthcare professionals. This allocation can be further supplemented through public-private partnerships with pharmaceutical companies, healthcare organizations, and philanthropic foundations. By leveraging these funding sources, the policy change can be sustained in the long term.
The specific language of the policy change includes mandating the provision of grants by HHS to hospitals, medical professional associations, and healthcare organizations. These grants will support initiatives aimed at improving the mental and behavioral health of healthcare professionals. Furthermore, funding will be provided for mental health training programs for students, residents, and professionals in the healthcare field. By providing targeted support and training, the policy change aims to enhance the mental well-being of healthcare professionals.
Discussion:
Comparable legislation and support for the H.R.1667 – Dr. Lorna Breen Health Care Provider Protection Act can be found in various academic and research publications. Studies have highlighted the significant impact of stress, burnout, and mental health challenges among healthcare professionals and have emphasized the need for comprehensive support systems. This policy change aligns with these findings by addressing the unique mental and behavioral health needs of healthcare providers.
Similar policies focusing on the mental health of healthcare professionals exist in other countries as well. For example, in the United Kingdom, the National Health Service (NHS) has implemented initiatives to support the mental well-being of their staff. These initiatives encompass regular mental health check-ups, counseling services, and training programs. By exploring and adopting best practices from such policies, the H.R.1667 – Dr. Lorna Breen Health Care Provider Protection Act can benefit from international experiences.
Addressing the concerns of suspected opposing interest groups is essential in the implementation of this policy change. It is anticipated that some groups may express concerns regarding the allocation of funding and the prioritization of mental health programs for healthcare professionals. To address these concerns, it is important to emphasize the substantial impacts of mental health on the overall well-being and quality of care provided by healthcare professionals. By highlighting the positive effects of supporting mental health, it is possible to garner broader support for the policy change.
Conclusions & Recommendations:
The H.R.1667 – Dr. Lorna Breen Health Care Provider Protection Act is a critical policy change that prioritizes the mental and behavioral health of healthcare professionals. By establishing grants and mandating actions, this policy aims to strengthen the resilience and well-being of healthcare providers.
To accomplish the group’s ideals and intent of the policy, it is recommended that comprehensive evaluation mechanisms be implemented to assess the effectiveness of the initiatives funded through this policy change. Monitoring and continuously improving the mental health support systems for healthcare professionals will ensure that the policy’s objectives are met. Moreover, dissemination of best practices and knowledge sharing among healthcare organizations can further enhance the impact of this policy change.
In conclusion, the H.R.1667 – Dr. Lorna Breen Health Care Provider Protection Act has the potential to bring about significant positive changes in the mental and behavioral health support systems for healthcare professionals. By securing funding, fostering collaboration, and addressing concerns, this policy change can contribute to a healthier and more resilient healthcare workforce.
