Community Health Assessment & Plan
Hospital Name
Medical Service Area:
City or County Name, State
Website: [Website Here]
Your Name:
Date:
1
Stakeholder Engagement
[Add: Key Stakeholders contributors]
2
Community Health Assessment & Plan (CHAP) Purpose:
[Add purpose statement. 2-3 sentences.]
CHAP Executive Summary
Introduction
CHAP Community Scope
[profile]
3
Community Profile
Needs Assessment
3 Top Population Health Priorities
3 Top Health Priority Goals
4
Proposed CHAP Interventions
Goal 1. Proposed Intervention Program
5
Proposed CHAP Interventions
Goal 2. Proposed Intervention Program
6
Proposed CHAP Interventions
Goal 3. Proposed Intervention Program
7
CHAP Report Conclusions
In conclusion…
Next step…
8
Top 3 Population Health
Priority Interventions
Program Interventions: Project Leader is the Chief Medical Office. Completed by: [May, 31, 202x]
Interventions and coordinating with hospital leadership, clinical staff and community leadership.
Intervention Health Policy Compliance Audits
Evaluation Measures and Indicators
Data Collection and Outcome Reporting
Program Evaluation:
Summary of Key Findings and Goals
Call to Action for Community Engagement and Collaboration
9
Disclosures: When mapping stakeholder interest to the top 3 public health priorities, several considerations were be taken into account, including, but not limited to:
A comprehensive evaluation was an integral part of our due diligence process. The Community Health Assessment program was thoroughly examined by an independent, unbiased committee. This committee included individuals with a diverse range of expertise spanning public health, finance, ethics, and law. Their role was to ensure that the program is well-structured, transparent in its processes, effective, and in line with our goal of addressing the top six public health priorities.
The conflict of interest check was a crucial part of our investigation. All individuals involved in the development, execution, and evaluation of the program underwent a stringent conflict of interest check. This process was put in place to verify that there were no personal, professional, or financial interests that could potentially influence their objectivity or compromise the program’s integrity.
We placed great emphasis on transparency throughout the entire lifecycle of the program. All pertinent information, including the program’s development process, funding sources, decision-making processes, and evaluation outcomes, was made available to stakeholders and the public. It was presented in a manner that was both comprehensible and accessible.
Our scrutiny extended to the financial aspects of the program as well. The program’s funding sources and allocation of resources were meticulously examined to ensure there was no mismanagement of funds or bias in the distribution of resources.
The program was also assessed from an ethical standpoint. We ensured that the program promotes fairness, respect, inclusivity, and is in compliance with all relevant laws and ethical standards.
Looking forward, we have instituted a system of independent review. Post-implementation, the program will undergo regular reviews by an independent body. This additional level of scrutiny will further assure stakeholders that the program remains free from conflicts of interest and continues to serve the public health priorities effectively.
In conclusion, our due diligence process for the Community Health Assessment program has been thorough and exhaustive. Based on our findings, we confidently assert that the program has been fully vetted and has no known conflicts of interest. We will, however, continue to encourage vigilance and open communication among all stakeholders to maintain the integrity and effectiveness of the program.
10
