A major piece of legislation passed in the 21st Century and analyze

Each student will take a major piece of legislation passed in the 21st Century and analyze how it made it to the President’s desk for signature. (The piece of legislation may be one that was ultimately vetoed.)

The paper should identify the legislation’s principal proponents (and opponents) both within the Congress and outside. Discuss how the the leadership, committees, and the administration influenced the process. Make special note of any unusual parliamentary maneuvers employed. Drawing upon the readings from The American Congress and the Congress Reconsidered, indicate whether the case you examined supports or refutes the authors’ contentions on how public policy is made. 

#major #piece #legislation #passed #21st #Century #analyze

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Machine learning questions. 4 questions. look at attached  1. Please construct a new dataset by either adding two independent variables or removing two

Machine learning questions. 4 questions. look at attached  1. Please construct a new dataset by either adding two independent variables or removing two independent variables from finalsample.dta dataset. If you choose to add two independent variables, you could add any two independent variables that you think help explain stock returns. If you choose to remove two independent variables, you

Instructions are attached  supporting doc attached Presenter’s Name:Gregory

Instructions are attached  supporting doc attached  Presenter’s Name: Gregory Swim Person Providing Critique: Brianna Davis Component Comments Case summary: Case was summarized in a succinct, easy-to-understand manner and was in the presenter’s own words. I understood the issue confronting the Supreme Court. APA’s brief: The APA’s stance was presented in

Instructions are attached  supporting doc attached Presenter’s Name:Lila Davis

Instructions are attached  supporting doc attached  Presenter’s Name: Lila Davis Person Providing Critique: Brianna Davis Component Comments Case summary: Case was summarized in a succinct, easy-to-understand manner and was in the presenter’s own words. I understood the issue confronting the Supreme Court. APA’s brief: The APA’s stance was presented in