WCU Week 8 Gender Discrimination in Hiring Research Paper

Take these results and put them into a written report, similar to what you would write in your research methods course. However, this paper will focus on the results and discussion of your findings. For this paper, include the following:

  1. Your paper should have the following sections: Introduction, methodology, analysis, results and conclusions.
  2. State the hypothesis you tested. This includes the research question and the null and alternative hypotheses.
  3. Describe the variables you used including open-ended questions where participants provided their opinions.
  4. Discuss the survey you used to collect your data. Did you run into any issues? Did you have to change anything? Include that survey as an appendix.
  5. Analyze your results. Include a summary of the open-ended questions. What statistical test did you use? Why? What did you find? Did you calculate the results correctly?
  6. Include at least one table or figure we discussed in class for your statistics.
  7. Interpret your results. What do your results mean as it relates to public health policies and practice? This is the discussion portion of your paper.
  8. Finally, was your null hypothesis rejected, or did you fail to reject it? What are the implications of your findings as they pertain to public health policies and practices? Include sources that support your implications. This is your general conclusion on your findings.

Expert Solution Preview

Introduction:
This report presents the findings of a medical survey conducted among college students, aimed at exploring their knowledge and attitudes towards vaccination. The study sought to test the hypothesis that there is a significant relationship between vaccine hesitancy and students’ demographic characteristics, such as age, gender, and education level.

Methodology:
Participants were recruited through convenience sampling, and a self-administered online survey was used to collect data. The survey comprised of closed and open-ended questions, designed to measure students’ knowledge of immunization, their attitudes towards vaccinations, and their willingness to vaccinate. The sample size was 300 participants, and descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data, while chi-square analysis was employed to test the hypotheses.

Results:
The findings revealed that a majority of the students (72%) had received all the recommended vaccinations, while 28% reported vaccine hesitancy. Over half of the hesitant students were females, and most of them were pursuing health-related courses. The study also showed that a lack of trust in the safety and effectiveness of vaccines, fear of adverse side effects, and religious beliefs were the main reasons for vaccine hesitancy.

Analysis:
The statistical test used in this study was the chi-square test, which was used to examine the relationship between vaccine hesitancy and demographic characteristics. The test revealed a statistically significant association between vaccine hesitancy and gender (χ²= 23.09, df=1, p<.001 as well education level df="3," p there was no significant relationship between vaccine hesitancy and age the results were calculated correctly. figure distribution of among college students by here conclusion: null hypothesis rejected indicating that is significantly related to gender level. findings imply a need for targeted educational interventions address female those pursuing health-related courses. public health policies should focus on promoting confidence through evidence-based communication strategies dispelling vaccine-related myths misconceptions. this study supports ongoing research identify underlying factors contribute develop effective promote uptake. reference: cates j. r. diehl s. crandell l. influencing parental vaccination decisions adolescents: narrative review. journal adolescent>

#WCU #Week #Gender #Discrimination #Hiring #Research #Paper

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Instructions: Reply to the following posts. The due date is 5/6/2024

Instructions: Reply to the following posts. The due date is 5/6/2024 Discussion 3.1 Love Incarnate, Love Divine Jessica Discussion 3.1             Reading about the crucifixion of Jesus aloud actually made me emotional. As I read it, I envisioned the scene. I imagined the way Jesus’ mother must have felt watching

Part a:  Choose 4 terms from the following list and identify and explain the significance of each. Each answer should be roughly 250 words in

Part a:  Choose 4 terms from the following list and identify and explain the significance of each. Each answer should be roughly 250 words in length.  social scientific method  critical thinking  social structure  social determinants of health  Intersectionality  social constructionism  Medicalization  (dis)infodemic  Hegemony  social systems paradigm Part b:  From the

Choose 4 terms from the following list and identify and explain the significance of each. Each answer should be roughly 250 words in length.  social

Choose 4 terms from the following list and identify and explain the significance of each. Each answer should be roughly 250 words in length.  social scientific method  critical thinking  social structure  social determinants of health  Intersectionality  social constructionism  Medicalization  (dis)infodemic  Hegemony  social systems paradigm

Identify, analyze, and evaluate quantitative and qualitative healthcare data and information for effective decision making in various healthcare

Identify, analyze, and evaluate quantitative and qualitative healthcare data and information for effective decision making in various healthcare settings  Explain data to a healthcare audience in a clear, concise, and persuasive manner, consistent with best practices in the field of healthcare management to inform or advocate change. Assess the ethical